Posture review
Best if you need clarity on current AI usage, governance gaps, document handling, and what the first controlled pilot should be.
Contact PalmerAI
Start with the right conversation.
PalmerAI should feel strategically simple again: posture review first, pilot second, managed governance when the operating model is already working.
Commercial model
Three clear steps, not a public intake maze.
Detailed paths
Posture review
Use this when the workflow, risk model, document boundary, approvals, and evidence model are not fully settled yet.
What to bring
- Current workflow summary
- Where prompts and documents enter the process
- Current risk concerns
- Who reviews today, if anyone
What you get back
- Workflow boundary recommendation
- Governance gap summary
- First pilot shape
- Suggested evidence model
Workflow pilot
Use this when the workflow is already known and the next decision is whether one governed path can be made reviewable, approval-aware, and evidence-ready, especially when documents or attachments are part of the path.
What to bring
- One named workflow
- Example prompt/document mix
- Expected business output
- Main approval or evidence concern
What you get back
- Narrow pilot boundary
- Approval-state design
- Evidence path recommendation
- Success criteria for a 30-day pilot
Managed governance
Use this when the main question is how the ongoing operating layer should be run across one or more governed workflows.
What to bring
- Planned operating scope
- Expected review cadence
- Whether delivery is direct or partner-led
- Support expectations
What you get back
- Suggested managed lane
- Scope boundary
- Support split
- Next-step recommendation