Included in the review
- AI usage mapping across real workflows
- Request and document risk review
- Approval-path design
- Policy gap review
- Evidence and reporting requirements
- Pilot recommendation
AI Governance Posture Review
Start with a clear governance map, not a vague AI project.
The PalmerAI Posture Review maps current AI usage, document exposure, approval pressure, and evidence needs so the first governed pilot is commercially and operationally clear.
Typical deliverables
- Current-state usage map
- Governance gap summary
- Recommended pilot scope
- Operating model proposal
Why this comes first
Most teams are not blocked by lack of model access. They are blocked by unclear workflow boundaries, uncertain document handling, and no agreement on what should trigger approval.
What it should clarify
The review should make five things legible: what PalmerAI would govern, where approvals would sit, which documents matter, what evidence needs to survive, and what the first pilot should prove.
What happens next
The usual next step is a narrow pilot with one use case, one approval path, one document-control boundary, and one evidence flow that can survive buyer review.
The posture review is the entry motion because it reduces noise before software scope expands.
It lets direct teams and partners align on one governed workflow, one buying path, and one evidence structure before implementation broadens.